« "Jon Lebkowsky of Polycot Talks about the Early Days of Web 2.0" | Main | David Brooks on "Neural Buddhists" » The Multitasking VirusIn my Buddhist practice, I've been cultivating attention. As so often happens, I ran into an article this morning that clearly related to weekend reading and thinking about mindfulness. For years I took pride in my ability to "multitask," which really means that I've been able to slice my time and plug in one chore while another is lagging. I let myself believe that I was doing multiple tasks at once, but that's impossible: rather, in multitasking you move attention from one focus to another, always focusing on one thing. Though it feels clever, it doesn't work with really complex task because there's attention overhead in getting into the complexity, so you can't bounce in and out or two and from quickly. I've come to believe that, if your dominant style involves multitasking, you're inherently shallow and scattered. If you're clever, you might have a bit more depth and focus than someone who isn't, but the division of attention that's inherent with multitasking is, I believe, detrimental to the overall quality of attention, therefore execution. Buddhism talks about mindfulness and bare attention. As I understand it, bare attention is attention without discrimination or conceptualization, and mindfulness is presence in the moment. I find myself wondering whether multitasking contradicts either of these concepts? Much digression. I was going to discuss the helpful article I found this morning via Tim Ferriss: part one of "The Multitasking Virus and the End of Learning?" by Josh Waitz, a chess master and martial artist who was the subject of the film "Searching for Bobby Fischer." Waitz has written a book called The Art of Learning: A Journey Into the Pursuit of Excellence, based on his own metalearning experiences. In the current article, he views multitasking as a form of inattention. On this afternoon, April 16, 2008, [Professor Dennis] Dalton was describing the satyagraha of Mahatma Gandhi, building the discussion around the Amritsar massacre in 1919, when British colonial soldiers opened fire on 10,000 unarmed Indian men, women and children trapped in Jallianwala Bagh Garden. For 39 years, Professor Dalton has been inspiring Columbia and Barnard students with his two semester political theory series that introduces undergrads to the ideas of Gandhi, Thoreau, Mill, Malcolm X, King, Plato, Lao Tzu. His lectures are about themes, connections between disparate minds, the powerful role of the individual in shaping our world. Students think they're multi-tasking, he says, but "the human mind cannot, in fact, multi-task without drastically reducing the quality of our processing." He says that "on the educational front, multi-tasking feels ... like a symptom of a broader sense of alienation." In part two, Waitzkin is going to talk about the crisis that ended his chess career, and how it relates to disengagement. jon posted this at 10:38 AM |
read weblogsky! latest posts: |







Comments
and we wonder. cult of selfish esteem. not far from A-lister blogger behavior IMO.
Posted by: madame l | May 26, 2008 11:25 AM
We're all multitaskers, like it or not. We resolve problems and explore our world in our dreams, as a result of our hanging onto thoughts and problems from the day. These threads of persistent experiences may be background tasks such that we don't recognize them, but they're there. When they become too many, we're distracted in our main thoughts and experiences. Conscious - unconscious crossover? or multi-tasking... you decide. heh.
Posted by: jc | May 26, 2008 12:56 PM
Good stuff, Jon -- thanks for pointing to this article.
@jc: Surely you acknowledge that our background thoughts during the day, much less our dreams at night, are a far sight removed from the wilful multitasking behavior that Waitzkin describes?
Posted by: Tim (@Twalk) Walker | May 27, 2008 9:03 AM
The thought of students cruising facebook or shopping for shoes during the lecture Waitzkin describes is indeed disheartening. But that's not "multitasking"-- that's ignoring. Those students are absent from class, even sitting in their assigned seats.
"Multitasking" in common usage means something else altogether. If a long meeting that barely concerns me allows me a few minutes to catch up on my email, does this mean I am "inherently shallow"? If I listen to radio news while working on design comps, am I "scattered"? That's quite a leap.
Posted by: Marla Erwin | May 27, 2008 2:59 PM
Marla, I'm not sure what you've described is multitasking. In your first example, I think you're just choosing to do another task, because the meeting isn't relevant. In the second example, perhaps your left brain is focused on one task and your right brain on another. Neither is extreme as the kind of multitasking I had in mind, based on my own (probably ADD) experience.
Posted by: Jon Lebkowsky | May 27, 2008 3:33 PM
While your eating or exercising or riding the bus you can study and so on. If you have a regular meditation practice then you have to make up the time.
Posted by: Anuk Ausar | July 14, 2008 4:20 PM