<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DemComm</title>
	<atom:link href="http://weblogsky.com/2008/10/10/demcomm/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://weblogsky.com/2008/10/10/demcomm/</link>
	<description>Smart thinking about digital culture, media, and the Internet.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 15:50:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sanford</title>
		<link>http://weblogsky.com/2008/10/10/demcomm/comment-page-1/#comment-40</link>
		<dc:creator>Sanford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 22:10:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogsky.com/2008/10/10/demcomm/#comment-40</guid>
		<description>Thanks Jon - and, as I said, in our emails - the effort was a tough one then.  At the time, we were not connected to the field organization then.  The Kerry Campaign&#039;s focus was fundraising and getting email addresses - coordinating with the field and local offices was (at the time) the least of our worries.

After our efforts had been marginalized due to the Dean Campaign&#039;s success - it was Kerry&#039;s success in the primaries and the sudden surge in online fundraising that brought the team a level of respect.  

I think Obama&#039;s coordination of field training, data distribution by the Blue State Digital Team and the overall organization&#039;s acceptance of the Internet and data tools as a successful lubricant for campaign success that finally broke the dam.

But I do ask one question - has the campaign actually driven the success of community, or did the community drive the success of the campaign - once the campaign provided the tools to operate with?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Jon &#8211; and, as I said, in our emails &#8211; the effort was a tough one then.  At the time, we were not connected to the field organization then.  The Kerry Campaign&#8217;s focus was fundraising and getting email addresses &#8211; coordinating with the field and local offices was (at the time) the least of our worries.</p>
<p>After our efforts had been marginalized due to the Dean Campaign&#8217;s success &#8211; it was Kerry&#8217;s success in the primaries and the sudden surge in online fundraising that brought the team a level of respect.  </p>
<p>I think Obama&#8217;s coordination of field training, data distribution by the Blue State Digital Team and the overall organization&#8217;s acceptance of the Internet and data tools as a successful lubricant for campaign success that finally broke the dam.</p>
<p>But I do ask one question &#8211; has the campaign actually driven the success of community, or did the community drive the success of the campaign &#8211; once the campaign provided the tools to operate with?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

