<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The loophole in the second law of thermodynamics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://weblogsky.com/2008/10/29/the-loophole-in-the-second-law-of-thermodynamics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://weblogsky.com/2008/10/29/the-loophole-in-the-second-law-of-thermodynamics/</link>
	<description>Culture &#124; Media &#124; Technology &#124; Humanities &#124; Future</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 21:47:56 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: HeresTomWithTheWeather</title>
		<link>http://weblogsky.com/2008/10/29/the-loophole-in-the-second-law-of-thermodynamics/comment-page-1/#comment-143</link>
		<dc:creator>HeresTomWithTheWeather</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 18:18:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogsky.com/2008/10/29/the-loophole-in-the-second-law-of-thermodynamics/#comment-143</guid>
		<description>the 2nd law applies only to closed systems and the world is not a closed system.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the 2nd law applies only to closed systems and the world is not a closed system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jonl</title>
		<link>http://weblogsky.com/2008/10/29/the-loophole-in-the-second-law-of-thermodynamics/comment-page-1/#comment-95</link>
		<dc:creator>jonl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 14:11:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogsky.com/2008/10/29/the-loophole-in-the-second-law-of-thermodynamics/#comment-95</guid>
		<description>Speaking of Dow Jones, James Suroweicki just published something that&#039;s relevant, I think:
http://www.newyorker.com/talk/financial/2008/11/03/081103ta_talk_surowiecki

What you describe is, I think, consistent with what&#039;s described in the Scientific American article. It&#039;s a question of equilibrium.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking of Dow Jones, James Suroweicki just published something that&#8217;s relevant, I think:<br />
<a href="http://www.newyorker.com/talk/financial/2008/11/03/081103ta_talk_surowiecki" rel="nofollow">http://www.newyorker.com/talk/financial/2008/11/03/081103ta_talk_surowiecki</a></p>
<p>What you describe is, I think, consistent with what&#8217;s described in the Scientific American article. It&#8217;s a question of equilibrium.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Witzel</title>
		<link>http://weblogsky.com/2008/10/29/the-loophole-in-the-second-law-of-thermodynamics/comment-page-1/#comment-94</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Witzel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 14:06:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogsky.com/2008/10/29/the-loophole-in-the-second-law-of-thermodynamics/#comment-94</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll take the &quot;I&#039;m not a physicist&quot; caveat too, but this makes sense to me.  We see lots of curves with variation, but an overall tendency to head in one direction (witness the Dow Jones average).  I wonder if we might see &quot;black swans&quot; in the path towards degeneration?  Might we see a large swing towards order or disorder that overwhelms previous generations of activity?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll take the &#8220;I&#8217;m not a physicist&#8221; caveat too, but this makes sense to me.  We see lots of curves with variation, but an overall tendency to head in one direction (witness the Dow Jones average).  I wonder if we might see &#8220;black swans&#8221; in the path towards degeneration?  Might we see a large swing towards order or disorder that overwhelms previous generations of activity?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jonl</title>
		<link>http://weblogsky.com/2008/10/29/the-loophole-in-the-second-law-of-thermodynamics/comment-page-1/#comment-93</link>
		<dc:creator>jonl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 13:48:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogsky.com/2008/10/29/the-loophole-in-the-second-law-of-thermodynamics/#comment-93</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not a physicist, but this seems to be new thinking about limits on application of the second law. Reality hasn&#039;t changed, just interpretation. *8^)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not a physicist, but this seems to be new thinking about limits on application of the second law. Reality hasn&#8217;t changed, just interpretation. *8^)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Prentiss Riddle</title>
		<link>http://weblogsky.com/2008/10/29/the-loophole-in-the-second-law-of-thermodynamics/comment-page-1/#comment-92</link>
		<dc:creator>Prentiss Riddle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 13:20:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogsky.com/2008/10/29/the-loophole-in-the-second-law-of-thermodynamics/#comment-92</guid>
		<description>This is very interesting, but is it news?  Aren&#039;t (say) eddies in rivers an everyday example?  Or, thinking a little bigger, stars and the life that they spawn by a concentration and subsequent controlled release of energy?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is very interesting, but is it news?  Aren&#8217;t (say) eddies in rivers an everyday example?  Or, thinking a little bigger, stars and the life that they spawn by a concentration and subsequent controlled release of energy?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
