<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Shopocalypse now: be mindful</title>
	<atom:link href="http://weblogsky.com/2008/12/07/shopocalypse-now-be-mindful/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://weblogsky.com/2008/12/07/shopocalypse-now-be-mindful/</link>
	<description>Smart thinking about culture, media, and the Internet.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 17:30:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: gary gach</title>
		<link>http://weblogsky.com/2008/12/07/shopocalypse-now-be-mindful/comment-page-1/#comment-725</link>
		<dc:creator>gary gach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 13:58:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogsky.com/2008/12/07/shopocalypse-now-be-mindful/#comment-725</guid>
		<description>Yes, but ain&#039;t this also kinda like phrenology?  I see it more as western science having been unbalanced, overemphasizing &#039;objectivity&#039; now accepting &#039;subjectivity&#039; ~~~~~~~~~~ e.g., Buddhists wearing hairnets for brain scans to measure where blood goes when a meditator envisions X ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~   ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ with now an over-emphasis on the brain.  Eventually, they&#039;ll come to realize, for example, what it means that the 20% of the brain&#039;s activity actually affects the human heart, whereas 80% of the human heart&#039;s messages affect the human brain.  And where is the chemical cocktail for charity given in order pump up self-congratulatory ego?  But  ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ heck, yes!  ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ this is all very interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, but ain&#8217;t this also kinda like phrenology?  I see it more as western science having been unbalanced, overemphasizing &#8216;objectivity&#8217; now accepting &#8216;subjectivity&#8217; ~~~~~~~~~~ e.g., Buddhists wearing hairnets for brain scans to measure where blood goes when a meditator envisions X ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~   ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ with now an over-emphasis on the brain.  Eventually, they&#8217;ll come to realize, for example, what it means that the 20% of the brain&#8217;s activity actually affects the human heart, whereas 80% of the human heart&#8217;s messages affect the human brain.  And where is the chemical cocktail for charity given in order pump up self-congratulatory ego?  But  ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ heck, yes!  ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ this is all very interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: z</title>
		<link>http://weblogsky.com/2008/12/07/shopocalypse-now-be-mindful/comment-page-1/#comment-263</link>
		<dc:creator>z</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2008 22:03:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogsky.com/2008/12/07/shopocalypse-now-be-mindful/#comment-263</guid>
		<description>don&#039;t get hooked---good advise.

a new research showed that generosity is based on some chemical in human&#039;s brain. I can&#039;t stop wondering if we can sooner or later prove or find the actual material that costs every pattern of human behavior...
would that make it better or worse? would that help us to promote more goodness and reduce badness?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>don&#8217;t get hooked&#8212;good advise.</p>
<p>a new research showed that generosity is based on some chemical in human&#8217;s brain. I can&#8217;t stop wondering if we can sooner or later prove or find the actual material that costs every pattern of human behavior&#8230;<br />
would that make it better or worse? would that help us to promote more goodness and reduce badness?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

