<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Steve Ivy: The Voice in the Stream</title>
	<atom:link href="http://weblogsky.com/2010/07/01/steve-ivy-the-voice-in-the-stream/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://weblogsky.com/2010/07/01/steve-ivy-the-voice-in-the-stream/</link>
	<description>Smart thinking about digital culture, media, and the Internet.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 15:50:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Ivy</title>
		<link>http://weblogsky.com/2010/07/01/steve-ivy-the-voice-in-the-stream/comment-page-1/#comment-1944</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Ivy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 16:18:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogsky.com/2010/07/01/steve-ivy-the-voice-in-the-stream/#comment-1944</guid>
		<description>Hi Jon! Thanks for sharing your thoughts - I agree that the third-person makes the most sense in some community contexts, but I still think the first-persona has more power. I do still like Flickr&#039;s model - acknowledge the third-person actions, but don&#039;t give them the same weight as something someone wrote.

That&#039;s a good measure for me - if someone took time to compose their thoughts, then it deserves more prominence in the stream, vs. the auto-generated activities that don&#039;t require the same investment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jon! Thanks for sharing your thoughts &#8211; I agree that the third-person makes the most sense in some community contexts, but I still think the first-persona has more power. I do still like Flickr&#8217;s model &#8211; acknowledge the third-person actions, but don&#8217;t give them the same weight as something someone wrote.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s a good measure for me &#8211; if someone took time to compose their thoughts, then it deserves more prominence in the stream, vs. the auto-generated activities that don&#8217;t require the same investment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

