<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Look like a winner</title>
	<atom:link href="http://weblogsky.com/2010/07/21/look-like-a-winner/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://weblogsky.com/2010/07/21/look-like-a-winner/</link>
	<description>Smart thinking about culture, media, and the Internet.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 17:30:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: jonl</title>
		<link>http://weblogsky.com/2010/07/21/look-like-a-winner/comment-page-1/#comment-1990</link>
		<dc:creator>jonl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Aug 2010 17:06:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogsky.com/2010/07/21/look-like-a-winner/#comment-1990</guid>
		<description>Thanks, and great to hear from you!  Re Google and Verizon, not knowing what they&#039;ve discussed, it&#039;s hard to say what they have in mind. My experience with Google over the years has been that they persistently favor Freedom to Connect, which is our preferred term. As you know, a true net neutrality isn&#039;t necessarily desirable. Packets do get prioritized, as a matter of course, for technical reasons.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, and great to hear from you!  Re Google and Verizon, not knowing what they&#8217;ve discussed, it&#8217;s hard to say what they have in mind. My experience with Google over the years has been that they persistently favor Freedom to Connect, which is our preferred term. As you know, a true net neutrality isn&#8217;t necessarily desirable. Packets do get prioritized, as a matter of course, for technical reasons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SR-O'Blivion, Atty @ Law</title>
		<link>http://weblogsky.com/2010/07/21/look-like-a-winner/comment-page-1/#comment-1987</link>
		<dc:creator>SR-O'Blivion, Atty @ Law</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 19:47:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogsky.com/2010/07/21/look-like-a-winner/#comment-1987</guid>
		<description>Another study says that jurors make up their minds which side they &quot;like better&quot; in the first 45 min. of trial. My 30 yrs of trial work is  uhhh, &quot;congruent with that&quot;.  I&#039;m ALWAYS the &quot;nicest guy in the courtroom&quot;.    If you can&#039;t parse the est. 10K microcues/second now thought to be its bandwidth, DON&#039;T try practicing law or negotiating for a living.  Reading every book written by the early pioneers like Ray Birdwhistell, Nierenberg &amp; Calero&#039;s &quot;The Art of Negotiating&quot;, and E. T. Hall and taking every psych course near that for my 2nd Undergrad major was CRUCIAL to successes in the Courtroom! And in Settlement!  Just by arriving early and getting MY choice of counsel-table, I once forced an oppo lawyer to try his case with his BACK to the Jury!  He lost.   Unspoken comms are EVERYTHING- which is why all bankers/lawyers/medics dress congruently.  And so do soldiers. 

Jon, is this Verizon-Google deal REALLY threatening Net-neutrality? 
 MoveOn.org says so...   and is petitioning! see
http://pol.moveon.org/google/?id=22362-9595587-q6FUTTx&amp;t=6
and 
  Aug 5 - 
 http://gizmodo.com/5605310/google-just-killed-net-neutrality

 Thanks, Old Friend!  You know who I am, but pls. help me preserve my professional anonymity.  The email is correct, the name? - nope! 
 But I have over 5M unique hits now on my 37-handmade-vid SueTube chan, name=  Crashman2.  The Crashman name also now comes back at least twice in Firstpage-results Googlesearches these days. I have NO time for social media, but I hope the weather is good for your drive. 
  When i got BoingBoinged (by someone I did not know), I got over 300 emails/day for a while... GRRR!  A mini-Slashdotting, I suppose. It all started with my hardcore Ballardianism See: 
http://www.boingboing.net/2008/04/09/plane-crash-video-fe.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another study says that jurors make up their minds which side they &#8220;like better&#8221; in the first 45 min. of trial. My 30 yrs of trial work is  uhhh, &#8220;congruent with that&#8221;.  I&#8217;m ALWAYS the &#8220;nicest guy in the courtroom&#8221;.    If you can&#8217;t parse the est. 10K microcues/second now thought to be its bandwidth, DON&#8217;T try practicing law or negotiating for a living.  Reading every book written by the early pioneers like Ray Birdwhistell, Nierenberg &amp; Calero&#8217;s &#8220;The Art of Negotiating&#8221;, and E. T. Hall and taking every psych course near that for my 2nd Undergrad major was CRUCIAL to successes in the Courtroom! And in Settlement!  Just by arriving early and getting MY choice of counsel-table, I once forced an oppo lawyer to try his case with his BACK to the Jury!  He lost.   Unspoken comms are EVERYTHING- which is why all bankers/lawyers/medics dress congruently.  And so do soldiers. </p>
<p>Jon, is this Verizon-Google deal REALLY threatening Net-neutrality?<br />
 MoveOn.org says so&#8230;   and is petitioning! see<br />
<a href="http://pol.moveon.org/google/?id=22362-9595587-q6FUTTx&#038;t=6" rel="nofollow">http://pol.moveon.org/google/?id=22362-9595587-q6FUTTx&#038;t=6</a><br />
and<br />
  Aug 5 &#8211;<br />
 <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5605310/google-just-killed-net-neutrality" rel="nofollow">http://gizmodo.com/5605310/google-just-killed-net-neutrality</a></p>
<p> Thanks, Old Friend!  You know who I am, but pls. help me preserve my professional anonymity.  The email is correct, the name? &#8211; nope!<br />
 But I have over 5M unique hits now on my 37-handmade-vid SueTube chan, name=  Crashman2.  The Crashman name also now comes back at least twice in Firstpage-results Googlesearches these days. I have NO time for social media, but I hope the weather is good for your drive.<br />
  When i got BoingBoinged (by someone I did not know), I got over 300 emails/day for a while&#8230; GRRR!  A mini-Slashdotting, I suppose. It all started with my hardcore Ballardianism See:<br />
<a href="http://www.boingboing.net/2008/04/09/plane-crash-video-fe.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.boingboing.net/2008/04/09/plane-crash-video-fe.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Lebkowsky</title>
		<link>http://weblogsky.com/2010/07/21/look-like-a-winner/comment-page-1/#comment-1983</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Lebkowsky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 15:54:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogsky.com/2010/07/21/look-like-a-winner/#comment-1983</guid>
		<description>Interesting relating this to content vs design.  My experience tells me that content trumps design, generally, on the web.  Any studies on this point?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting relating this to content vs design.  My experience tells me that content trumps design, generally, on the web.  Any studies on this point?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sue Rostvold</title>
		<link>http://weblogsky.com/2010/07/21/look-like-a-winner/comment-page-1/#comment-1958</link>
		<dc:creator>Sue Rostvold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2010 17:55:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogsky.com/2010/07/21/look-like-a-winner/#comment-1958</guid>
		<description>Interesting thoughts Jon. Thanks for posting. It&#039;s a bit disturbing to think that what you say isn&#039;t as important as what you look like. Disturbing, but really not all that surprising in today&#039;s society.

I&#039;m wondering how this translate to the online world. Content vs. Design?  It seems that content is what allows people to find us online, the appearance, design and ease of use is what usually persuades them to spend some time, but ultimately it&#039;s the quality content that keeps them interested and hopefully coming back for more. Sorry to go off on a social media type tangent, but you know how it is. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting thoughts Jon. Thanks for posting. It&#8217;s a bit disturbing to think that what you say isn&#8217;t as important as what you look like. Disturbing, but really not all that surprising in today&#8217;s society.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m wondering how this translate to the online world. Content vs. Design?  It seems that content is what allows people to find us online, the appearance, design and ease of use is what usually persuades them to spend some time, but ultimately it&#8217;s the quality content that keeps them interested and hopefully coming back for more. Sorry to go off on a social media type tangent, but you know how it is. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

