<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Jon Lebkowsky&#039;s Weblog &#187; Environment/Climate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://weblogsky.com/category/environmentclimate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://weblogsky.com</link>
	<description>Media &#124; Business &#124; Culture &#124; Future</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 13:38:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Penguins, climate change, politics &#8211; short post (really)</title>
		<link>http://weblogsky.com/2009/12/26/penguins-climate-change-politics-short-post-really/</link>
		<comments>http://weblogsky.com/2009/12/26/penguins-climate-change-politics-short-post-really/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2009 00:40:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jonl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment/Climate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arctic Ice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Change Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copenhagen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friend Emily]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Habitat Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Montaigne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Yorker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Penguins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Slide Show]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogsky.com/2009/12/26/penguins-climate-change-politics-short-post-really/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fen Montaigne has written a piece about penguins and climate change for the New Yorker. The magazine&#8217;s web site features a disturbing slide show about how the penguins are threatened by habitat change due to warming sufficient to melt arctic ice. Montaigne suggests habitat change will likely be global, affecting humans as well as penguins. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>Fen Montaigne has written a piece about penguins and climate change for the New Yorker. The magazine&#8217;s web site features a disturbing <a href="http://www.newyorker.com/online/multimedia/2009/12/21/091221_audioslideshow_penguins">slide show about how the penguins are threatened by habitat change </a>due to warming sufficient to melt arctic ice. Montaigne suggests habitat change will likely be global, affecting humans as well as penguins.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been thinking how politicization of climate change is making it hard to think about the problem, which is clearly real, and decide what action we should be taking.</p>
<p>My friend Emily Gertz was in Copenhagen; <a href="http://www.well.com/conf/inkwell.vue/topics/372/Emily-Gertz-From-the-Climate-Tal-page01.html">she&#8217;s reporting on it in a discussion at the WELL.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://weblogsky.com/2009/12/26/penguins-climate-change-politics-short-post-really/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Finding the forks in the road</title>
		<link>http://weblogsky.com/2009/11/29/finding-the-forks-in-the-road/</link>
		<comments>http://weblogsky.com/2009/11/29/finding-the-forks-in-the-road/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 02:25:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jonl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment/Climate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sustainability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Confusion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Decisions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Sources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joel Makower]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pathway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rod Bell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Succession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncertainty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Water Management]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogsky.com/2009/11/29/finding-the-forks-in-the-road/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Joel Makower considers four studies that explore the impact on business of climate change and related issues &#8211; the need for water management, and uncertainty about energy sources. Says Joel, &#8220;our world these days seems to be a succession of forks in the road, points at which decisions need to be made about which pathway [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>Joel Makower considers four studies that explore the impact on business of climate change and related issues &#8211; the need for water management, and uncertainty about energy sources. Says Joel, &#8220;our world these days seems to be a succession of forks in the road, points at which decisions need to be made about which pathway we collectively must take.&#8221; This reminds me of something <a href="http://www.google.com/profiles/rodbell">Rod Bell</a> used to say, repeatedly: &#8220;To solve big problems, you have to go through big confusion.&#8221; <a href="http://http://makower.typepad.com/joel_makower/2009/11/four-studies-that-ponder-the-road-from-here.html">[Link]</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://weblogsky.com/2009/11/29/finding-the-forks-in-the-road/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Water and waste</title>
		<link>http://weblogsky.com/2009/11/23/water-and-waste/</link>
		<comments>http://weblogsky.com/2009/11/23/water-and-waste/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 15:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jonl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment/Climate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Academic Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Backups]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Basements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drinking Water]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eye Opener]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Officials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Infrastructure Projects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pathogens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plastic Bottles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Beaches]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rainwater]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Raw Sewage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sewage Spills]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tap Water]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toxic Pollution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Water Intake]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Water Pollution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Waterways]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogsky.com/2009/11/23/water-and-waste/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you&#8217;re tired of worrying about climate change or the economy, you can start worrying about water pollution: an article in the New York Times says raw sewage is leaking into waterways. I know that I take water for granted, and I suspect you do, too. There&#8217;s always been plenty, and it&#8217;s been so cheap [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>If you&#8217;re tired of worrying about climate change or the economy, you can start worrying about water pollution: an <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/23/us/23sewer.html?_r=1&amp;hp">article in the New York </a><i><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/23/us/23sewer.html?_r=1&amp;hp">Times</a> </i>says raw sewage is leaking into waterways. I know that I take water for granted, and I suspect you do, too. There&#8217;s always been plenty, and it&#8217;s been so cheap we think of it as free. For most of my life, we drank water from the tap without giving it a thought. Lately we&#8217;re more comfortable buying the tap water in plastic bottles, thinking somehow that packaged water we pay more for must be safer/healthier.<br />
<blockquote>I don&#8217;t really know where my water comes from, and how vulnerable that mystery supply is to toxic pollution. An eye-opener from the <i>Times</i>:<br />
As cities have grown rapidly across the nation, many have neglected infrastructure projects and paved over green spaces that once absorbed rainwater. That has contributed to sewage backups into more than 400,000 basements and spills into thousands of streets, according to data collected by state and federal officials. Sometimes, waste has overflowed just upstream from drinking water intake points or near public beaches.</p>
<p>There is no national record-keeping of how many illnesses are caused by sewage spills. But academic research suggests that as many as 20 million people each year become ill from drinking water containing bacteria and other pathogens that are often spread by untreated waste.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://weblogsky.com/2009/11/23/water-and-waste/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Coal and ozone nonattainment in Austin</title>
		<link>http://weblogsky.com/2009/10/28/coal-and-ozone-nonattainment-in-austin/</link>
		<comments>http://weblogsky.com/2009/10/28/coal-and-ozone-nonattainment-in-austin/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 18:45:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jonl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment/Climate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Air Quality Compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Burnt Orange Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Construction Costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Construction Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[County Commissioner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economic Impacts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electricity Bills]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emissions Standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Bills]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Oversight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Higher Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hubner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Local Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money Link]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Businesses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ozone Nonattainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Power Plants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Searles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transportation Projects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Travis County]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogsky.com/2009/10/28/coal-and-ozone-nonattainment-in-austin/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ozone nonattainment&#8217;s impact: Chris Searles has an enightening post at Burnt Orange Report about the &#8220;Quit Coal by 2014&#8243; scenario for Austin. He quotes Travis County Commissioner Karen Hubner, who &#8220;recently mapped out ozone nonattainment&#8217;s economic impacts to Austinites, saying:&#160; &#8216;The implications are huge and will cost taxpayers a lot of money. [Link] &#8220;First, going [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>Ozone nonattainment&#8217;s impact: Chris Searles has an enightening post at <i>Burnt Orange Report </i>about the <a href="http://www.burntorangereport.com/diary/9446/i-endorse-paces-quit-coal-scenario">&#8220;Quit Coal by 2014&#8243;</a> scenario for Austin. He quotes Travis County Commissioner Karen Hubner, who &#8220;recently mapped out ozone nonattainment&#8217;s economic impacts to Austinites, saying:&nbsp; &#8216;The implications are huge and <b> will cost taxpayers a lot of money.</b> <a href="http://www.burntorangereport.com/diary/9520/benefits-of-the-quit-coal-by-2014-scenario-3-less-ozone">[Link]</a><br />
<blockquote>&#8220;<u>First</u>, going into nonattainment would subject us to a slew of new rules and regulations that <b> could hang over our heads for up to 20 years </b><br />
after we return to air quality compliance. These regulations would<br />
create a lag effect on everything, from higher energy bills for<br />
households to creation of new businesses, as well as more expensive<br />
transportation projects (that you finance).
<p><u>Second</u>, &#8220;Nonattainment would require us to <b> cede local control of transportation projects to state and federal oversight </b> regulations. Conforming to their regulations would create longer construction times and higher construction costs.
</p>
<p><u>Third</u>, &#8220;&#8230; our businesses could be subject to much<br />
harsher oversight than they currently enjoy&#8230; Nonattainment<br />
regulations would subject power plants to <b> higher emissions standards</b>, resulting in <b> higher electricity bills. Gasoline might have to be reformulated </b> before it can be used to fuel our vehicles, and <b> your car would be required to pass stringent emissions testing.</b>&#8221; </p>
</blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://weblogsky.com/2009/10/28/coal-and-ozone-nonattainment-in-austin/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
