<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Weblogsky: Culture, Media, and the Internet</title>
	<atom:link href="http://weblogsky.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://weblogsky.com</link>
	<description>Smart thinking about digital culture, media, and the Internet.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 15:50:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on U.S. Army guide to Pinterest by Jon Lebkowsky</title>
		<link>http://weblogsky.com/2012/02/08/u-s-army-guide-to-pinterest/comment-page-1/#comment-5158</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Lebkowsky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 15:50:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogsky.com/?p=1398#comment-5158</guid>
		<description>Thanks! Glad you found your way here. 

In social media, I find that high adoption of a platform drives more adoption of the platform. I&#039;ve been thinking how Pinterest differs from Flickr, the seminal platform for social sharing of images, and Facebook, which includes images as part of a larger framework for sharing. Part of the difference is a difference in demographics (http://www.ignitesocialmedia.com/social-networks/pinterest-demographic-data/) - more women, more mainstream.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks! Glad you found your way here. </p>
<p>In social media, I find that high adoption of a platform drives more adoption of the platform. I&#8217;ve been thinking how Pinterest differs from Flickr, the seminal platform for social sharing of images, and Facebook, which includes images as part of a larger framework for sharing. Part of the difference is a difference in demographics (<a href="http://www.ignitesocialmedia.com/social-networks/pinterest-demographic-data/" rel="nofollow">http://www.ignitesocialmedia.com/social-networks/pinterest-demographic-data/</a>) &#8211; more women, more mainstream.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on U.S. Army guide to Pinterest by Ellie Kesselman</title>
		<link>http://weblogsky.com/2012/02/08/u-s-army-guide-to-pinterest/comment-page-1/#comment-5155</link>
		<dc:creator>Ellie Kesselman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 13:39:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogsky.com/?p=1398#comment-5155</guid>
		<description>This is hilarious! I had no idea the U.S. Army was this umm... au courante with social media They were on Pinterest back in early February! 

I find it so incongruous to see the CME Group and General Electric&#039;s turbine manufacturing division, whatever the name is, on Pinterest. But it does work for some companies e.g. IBM Research (mostly middle-aged men with PhD&#039;s from Zurich) somehow  runs three of four great Pinterest boards, so I guess one never knows.

Similar incongruity is a facet of Twitter, so I should have known to expect it with Pinterest. Some corporate and government agencies choose wisely when deciding who (and how) they want company Twitter accounts run. It varies within organizations, I&#039;ve noticed that IBM Mexico is great, very engaged, replies in Spanish or English, has unique content from the dozens of other mostly drab IBM Twitter accounts. Google Research, and (of all organizations!) The St. Louis Federal Reserve Bank were very congenial and responsive, although both have cut back a lot from a year ago. It is fun to see who adapts well to social media! There are many surprises. 

Thank you so much for posting this Slideshare deck. I found my way here circuitously, via SEO King, Danny Sullivan&#039;s review of the new (seemingly more semantically flavored) Google search, then to my account on Freebase, and a list of mostly awful or moribund blogs compiled (by some pre-Google acquisition of Metaweb user) in 2005 or so. Among them was the elderly  &quot;Crufty Bits&quot;, or similar. It listed Weblogsky in the sidebar, so I am very fortunate to have found you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is hilarious! I had no idea the U.S. Army was this umm&#8230; au courante with social media They were on Pinterest back in early February! </p>
<p>I find it so incongruous to see the CME Group and General Electric&#8217;s turbine manufacturing division, whatever the name is, on Pinterest. But it does work for some companies e.g. IBM Research (mostly middle-aged men with PhD&#8217;s from Zurich) somehow  runs three of four great Pinterest boards, so I guess one never knows.</p>
<p>Similar incongruity is a facet of Twitter, so I should have known to expect it with Pinterest. Some corporate and government agencies choose wisely when deciding who (and how) they want company Twitter accounts run. It varies within organizations, I&#8217;ve noticed that IBM Mexico is great, very engaged, replies in Spanish or English, has unique content from the dozens of other mostly drab IBM Twitter accounts. Google Research, and (of all organizations!) The St. Louis Federal Reserve Bank were very congenial and responsive, although both have cut back a lot from a year ago. It is fun to see who adapts well to social media! There are many surprises. </p>
<p>Thank you so much for posting this Slideshare deck. I found my way here circuitously, via SEO King, Danny Sullivan&#8217;s review of the new (seemingly more semantically flavored) Google search, then to my account on Freebase, and a list of mostly awful or moribund blogs compiled (by some pre-Google acquisition of Metaweb user) in 2005 or so. Among them was the elderly  &#8220;Crufty Bits&#8221;, or similar. It listed Weblogsky in the sidebar, so I am very fortunate to have found you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Iron Sky by Lold</title>
		<link>http://weblogsky.com/2012/02/08/iron-sky/comment-page-1/#comment-4708</link>
		<dc:creator>Lold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2012 09:32:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogsky.com/?p=1404#comment-4708</guid>
		<description>Is the film any good thouhg... we&#039;ll I found these reviews, and people have not liked it too much?

http://www.reddit.com/r/FilmReview/comments/qn8xf/iron_sky_reviews/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is the film any good thouhg&#8230; we&#8217;ll I found these reviews, and people have not liked it too much?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.reddit.com/r/FilmReview/comments/qn8xf/iron_sky_reviews/" rel="nofollow">http://www.reddit.com/r/FilmReview/comments/qn8xf/iron_sky_reviews/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on AR glasses coming from Google by Introduction – The Shape of AR - RealityAugmented</title>
		<link>http://weblogsky.com/2012/02/07/ar-glasses-coming-from-google/comment-page-1/#comment-4693</link>
		<dc:creator>Introduction – The Shape of AR - RealityAugmented</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2012 00:01:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogsky.com/?p=1395#comment-4693</guid>
		<description>[...] Jon Lebowsky wrote a few days ago: &#8220;Google glasses (or maybe we should all ‘em Google Goggles) will be an [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Jon Lebowsky wrote a few days ago: &#8220;Google glasses (or maybe we should all ‘em Google Goggles) will be an [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Resilient Communities by Jon Lebkowsky</title>
		<link>http://weblogsky.com/2012/02/25/resilient-communities/comment-page-1/#comment-4650</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Lebkowsky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 18:35:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogsky.com/?p=1441#comment-4650</guid>
		<description>Not 100% sure. It has been posted at a Ning community site: http://resilientcc.ning.com/. The site&#039;s no longer active, so I couldn&#039;t see who owned it, or who had come up with the chart. I searched in vain for an author. I think it&#039;s a good conceptual overview.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not 100% sure. It has been posted at a Ning community site: <a href="http://resilientcc.ning.com/" rel="nofollow">http://resilientcc.ning.com/</a>. The site&#8217;s no longer active, so I couldn&#8217;t see who owned it, or who had come up with the chart. I searched in vain for an author. I think it&#8217;s a good conceptual overview.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Resilient Communities by John Robb</title>
		<link>http://weblogsky.com/2012/02/25/resilient-communities/comment-page-1/#comment-4649</link>
		<dc:creator>John Robb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 18:25:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogsky.com/?p=1441#comment-4649</guid>
		<description>Jon,

Thanks much.  Question:  who put the chart together?

JR</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jon,</p>
<p>Thanks much.  Question:  who put the chart together?</p>
<p>JR</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Bruce Springsteen is angry by Kenny</title>
		<link>http://weblogsky.com/2012/02/18/bruce-springsteen-is-angry/comment-page-1/#comment-4639</link>
		<dc:creator>Kenny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 12:11:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogsky.com/?p=1409#comment-4639</guid>
		<description>Great article and sentiment on the part of Springsteen.  Thanks for the notice and link!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article and sentiment on the part of Springsteen.  Thanks for the notice and link!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Gothic High Tech by Gamecentral247</title>
		<link>http://weblogsky.com/2011/12/31/gothic-high-tech/comment-page-1/#comment-4612</link>
		<dc:creator>Gamecentral247</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 17:30:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogsky.com/?p=1343#comment-4612</guid>
		<description>Hi, good stuff posted.

I saw you are doing affiliate amazon. 

I am new in the field. just wondering how does it turn out for you 

Great Blog btw :)

&lt;a href=&quot;www.gamecentral247.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;GameCentral247&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, good stuff posted.</p>
<p>I saw you are doing affiliate amazon. </p>
<p>I am new in the field. just wondering how does it turn out for you </p>
<p>Great Blog btw :)</p>
<p><a href="www.gamecentral247.com" rel="nofollow">GameCentral247</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Thinking about the future of online marketing by 07 &#124; Groundwork &#124; The Web as a Medium: Four Observations &#124; mediamachina</title>
		<link>http://weblogsky.com/2011/08/01/thinking-about-the-future-of-online-marketing/comment-page-1/#comment-4610</link>
		<dc:creator>07 &#124; Groundwork &#124; The Web as a Medium: Four Observations &#124; mediamachina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2011 16:10:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogsky.com/2011/08/01/thinking-about-the-future-of-online-marketing/#comment-4610</guid>
		<description>[...] not by social media but by a broader set of tools and new contexts for relationship. Jon Lebkowsky Thinking about the future of online marketing # Take a truck made of 10 tons of metal and plastic. Make it plunge into the sea from the end of a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] not by social media but by a broader set of tools and new contexts for relationship. Jon Lebkowsky Thinking about the future of online marketing # Take a truck made of 10 tons of metal and plastic. Make it plunge into the sea from the end of a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Multiverses, dark matter, infinity: Occupy Reality by Ted Newcomb</title>
		<link>http://weblogsky.com/2011/12/21/multiverses-dark-matter-infinity-occupy-reality/comment-page-1/#comment-4607</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted Newcomb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 13:20:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogsky.com/?p=1327#comment-4607</guid>
		<description>Just &quot;Dust in the Wind&quot; Jon. Cosmic dust tho!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just &#8220;Dust in the Wind&#8221; Jon. Cosmic dust tho!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The truth about OWS by &#34;We hear that OWS has no clear message, but is it precisely because the dis-organization&#8230; &#124; scot hacker&#039;s foobar blog</title>
		<link>http://weblogsky.com/2011/11/26/the-truth-about-ows/comment-page-1/#comment-4557</link>
		<dc:creator>&#34;We hear that OWS has no clear message, but is it precisely because the dis-organization&#8230; &#124; scot hacker&#039;s foobar blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Nov 2011 18:30:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogsky.com/2011/11/26/the-truth-about-ows/#comment-4557</guid>
		<description>[...] The truth about OWS Naomi Wolf in The Guardian: we hear that Occupy Wall Street has no clear message, but is it precisely because the dis-organization has a clear message, set of goals, and growing force that we&#039;re seein&#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The truth about OWS Naomi Wolf in The Guardian: we hear that Occupy Wall Street has no clear message, but is it precisely because the dis-organization has a clear message, set of goals, and growing force that we&#039;re seein&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The truth about OWS by jonl</title>
		<link>http://weblogsky.com/2011/11/26/the-truth-about-ows/comment-page-1/#comment-4556</link>
		<dc:creator>jonl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Nov 2011 13:14:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogsky.com/2011/11/26/the-truth-about-ows/#comment-4556</guid>
		<description>Thanks for pointing out that oversight, Scot. I&#039;ve added the link. I&#039;ve also updated with a link to an Alternet piece that forcefully questions Wolf&#039;s suggestion that there&#039;s been an effort coordinated at the Federal level to take Occupy down. 

Link to Wolf&#039;s original piece: http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/cifamerica/2011/nov/25/shocking-truth-about-crackdown-occupy

Link to the Alternet response by Joshua Holland: http://www.alternet.org/occupywallst/153222/naomi_wolf%E2%80%99s_%E2%80%98shocking_truth%E2%80%99_about_the_%E2%80%98occupy_crackdowns%E2%80%99_offers_anything_but_the_truth/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for pointing out that oversight, Scot. I&#8217;ve added the link. I&#8217;ve also updated with a link to an Alternet piece that forcefully questions Wolf&#8217;s suggestion that there&#8217;s been an effort coordinated at the Federal level to take Occupy down. </p>
<p>Link to Wolf&#8217;s original piece: <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/cifamerica/2011/nov/25/shocking-truth-about-crackdown-occupy" rel="nofollow">http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/cifamerica/2011/nov/25/shocking-truth-about-crackdown-occupy</a></p>
<p>Link to the Alternet response by Joshua Holland: <a href="http://www.alternet.org/occupywallst/153222/naomi_wolf%E2%80%99s_%E2%80%98shocking_truth%E2%80%99_about_the_%E2%80%98occupy_crackdowns%E2%80%99_offers_anything_but_the_truth/" rel="nofollow">http://www.alternet.org/occupywallst/153222/naomi_wolf%E2%80%99s_%E2%80%98shocking_truth%E2%80%99_about_the_%E2%80%98occupy_crackdowns%E2%80%99_offers_anything_but_the_truth/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The truth about OWS by Scot Hacker</title>
		<link>http://weblogsky.com/2011/11/26/the-truth-about-ows/comment-page-1/#comment-4555</link>
		<dc:creator>Scot Hacker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Nov 2011 08:18:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogsky.com/2011/11/26/the-truth-about-ows/#comment-4555</guid>
		<description>Jon, do you have a link to the Guardian piece? Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jon, do you have a link to the Guardian piece? Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Thinking about memory, association, and identification by Taran Rampersad</title>
		<link>http://weblogsky.com/2011/11/18/thinking-about-memory-association-and-identification/comment-page-1/#comment-4530</link>
		<dc:creator>Taran Rampersad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 04:22:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogsky.com/2011/11/18/thinking-about-memory-association-and-identification/#comment-4530</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m a bit rusty on my Buddhist philosophy, but I do recall the &#039;mind-in-present&#039; aspect. And that fits with the attention. Often when I forget things - and as the years woosh by I am noticing it a bit more often - it&#039;s because my mind isn&#039;t in the now. 

It doesn&#039;t help that my now is usually hours, days or years in the future. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a bit rusty on my Buddhist philosophy, but I do recall the &#8216;mind-in-present&#8217; aspect. And that fits with the attention. Often when I forget things &#8211; and as the years woosh by I am noticing it a bit more often &#8211; it&#8217;s because my mind isn&#8217;t in the now. </p>
<p>It doesn&#8217;t help that my now is usually hours, days or years in the future. :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

